Demos: Sinewave Synthesis: Bibliography

Below are listed Remez, Rubin, et. al., publications in chronological order followed by some other suggestions.

Rubin, P. E. (1980). Sinewave synthesis. Internal memorandum. Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut.

Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Carrell, T. D. (1981). Speech perception without traditional speech cues. Science, 212, 947-950.

Remez, R. E. & Rubin, P. E. (1983). The stream of speech. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 63-66.

Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1983). Coding of the speech spectrum in three time-varying sinusoids. In C. Parkins and S. W. Anderson (Eds.), Cochlear Prostheses (pp. 485-489). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

Remez, R. E. & Rubin, P. E. (1984). On the perception of intonation in sinusoidal sentences. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 429-440.

Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Nygaard, L. C. & Howell, W. A. (1987). Perceptual normalization of vowels produced by sinusoidal voices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 40-61.

Remez, R. E., & Rubin, P. E. (1990). On the perception of speech from time-varying attributes: Contributions of amplitude variation. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 313-325.

Remez, R. E., & Rubin, P. E. (1993). On the intonation of sinusoidal sentences: Contour and pitch height. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1983-1988.

Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Berns, S. M., Pardo, J. S. & Lang, J. M. (1994). On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129-156.

Saldaña, H. M., Fellowes J. M., Remez, R. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Audio-visual speech perception without speech cues: A first report. In D. G. Stork and M. E. Hennecke (Eds.), Speechreading by Man and Machines: Models, Systems and Applications (pp. 145-151). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Remez, R. E., Fellowes, J. M. & Rubin, P. E. (1997). Talker identification based on phonetic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 651-656.

Fellowes, J. M., Remez, R. E. & Rubin, P. E. (1997). Perceiving the sex and identity of a talker without natural vocal timbre. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 839-849.

Remez, R. E., Van Dyk, J. L., Fellowes, J. M. & Rubin, P. E. (1998). On the perception of qualitative and phonetic similarities of voices. In P. K. Kuhl & L. A. Crum (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Acoustics and the 135th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Volume 4 (pp. 2063-2064). New York: Acoustical Society of America.

Remez, R., Fellowes, J.M., Pisoni, D.B., Goh, W.D. & Rubin, P.E. (1998). Multimodal perceptual organization of speech: Evidence from tone analogs of spoken utterances. Speech Communication, 26, 65-73.

Goh, W.D., Pisoni, D.B., Kirk, K.I., & Remez, R.E. (2001). Audio-visual perception of sinewave speech in an adult cochlear implant user: A case study. Ear and Hearing, 22, 412-419.

Remez, R. E., Pardo, J.S., Piorkowski, R. L. & Rubin, P. E. (2001). On the bistability of sinewave analogs of speech. Psychological Science, 12, 24-29.

Liebenthal, E., Binder, J.R., Piorkowski, R.L. & Remez, R.E. (2003). Short-term reorganization of auditory cortex induced by phonetic experience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 549-558

Remez, R. E. (2005). Perceptual organization of speech. In D. B. Pisoni and R. E. Remez (Eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception (pp. 28-50). Oxford: Blackwell.

Rubin, P. (2005). SWS: an overview and history. Unpublished draft, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT.

Remez, R. E. (2008), Sine-wave speech, Scholarpedia, 3(7):2394.

Remez, R. E., Dubowski, K. R., Broder, R. S., Davids, M. L., Grossman, Y. S., Moskalenko, M., Pardo, J. S., and Hasbun, S. M. (2011). Auditory-phonetic projection and lexical structure in the recognition of sine-wave words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 968–977. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020734.

Remez, Robert E. and Rubin, Philip E. (2016). Perceptual Organization and Lawful Specification. Ecological Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 160-165.

_____

Bailey, P. J., Summerfield, Q., and Dorman, M. (1977). On the identification of sine-wave analogues of certain speech sounds. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, Report No. SR-51/52, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, pp. 1–25.

Bregman, A. S., & Pinker, S. (1978). Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 19-31.

Best, C.T., Morrongiello, B. & Robson, R. (1981). Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 191-211.

Best, C. T., Studdert-Kennedy, M., Manuel, S. & Rubin-Spitz, J. (1989). Discovering phonetic coherence in acoustic patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 237-250.

Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Carrell, T. D. & Opie, J. M. (1992). The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 52.4, 437-445

Johnson, K. & Ralston, J. V. (1994). Automaticity in speech perception: Some speech/nonspeech comparisons. Phonetica 51, 195-209.

Barker, J. (1998). The relationship between speech perception and auditory organisation: Studies with spectrally reduced speech. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield.

Barker, J. and &, M. (1999). Is the sine-wave speech cocktail party worth attending? Speech Communications, 27, 159–174.

Wong, D., Miyamoto, R.T., Pisoni, D.B., Sehgal, M., & Hutchins, G. (1999). PET imaging of cochlear-implant and normal-hearing subjects listening to speech and nonspeech stimuli. Hearing Research 132, 34-42.

Wong, D., Pisoni, D.B., Learn, J., Gandour, J., Miyamoto, R.T., and Hutchins, G.D. (2002). PET imaging of differential cortical activation to monaural speech and nonspeech stimuli. Hearing Research 166/1-2, 9-23 (April).

Ellis, Dan. (1996). Sinewave Speech Analysis/Synthesis in MATLAB.

Brungart, D., Iyer, N., & Simpson, B. (2006). Monaural speech segregation using synthetic speech signals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2327-2333.

Rosen, S., and Iverson, P. (2007). Constructing adequate non-speech analogues: What is special about speech anyway? Developmental Science, 10, 165–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00550.x.

Aravamudhan, R., Lotto, A. J., & Hawks, J. W. (2008). Perceptual context effects of speech and nonspeech sounds: the role of auditory categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008 Sep;124(3):1695-703. doi: 10.1121/1.2956482. PMID: 19045660; PMCID: PMC2601703.

Roberts, Brian, Summers, Robert J., & Bailey, Peter J. (2010). The perceptual organization of sine-wave speech under competitive conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 804; https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3445786

Feng, Y. M., Xu, L., Zhou, N., Yang, G., and Yin, S. K. (2012). Sine-wave speech recognition in a tonal language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, , EL133–EL138. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3670594.

Nittrouer, S., Kuess, J., & Lowenstein, J. H. (2015). Speech perception of sine-wave signals by children with cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015 May;137(5):2811-22. doi: 10.1121/1.4919316. PMID: 25994709; PMCID: PMC4441708.

Stuart Rosen and Sze Ngar Catherine Hui. (2015). Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 3698; https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4937605

< SWS >